Answer 4a to the supplying $QI pop-quiz. I (kinda?) answered this in the metadata (μεταδατα, a solidly Greek word) to Answer 3:
So, that's $6,814.53 more $QI than $AVAX.
Answer 4b
This question is a touch ambiguous. I interpreted it to mean year-end $AVAX- and $QI-yields.
Given that, a new tab, "Balance QI and QI-AVAX seed," on the SPREADSHEETzorx! shows that 98% goes to initial $QI SUPPLY and 2% goes to QI-AVAX LP STAKE.
Can we do better than this approach? YES, WE ... sorry, I meant to write: "well, let's see!" in the next set of answers and following exercises.
Answer 4c
66% $AVAX-yield and 33% $QI-yield. As you can see from the previous answer, even a 98% $QI seed only gives a 50% $AVAX yield, SO! to answer this question, we need to continuously resupply the QI-AVAX LP STAKE to generate more $QI to generate more $AVAX yield.
This will require I reconfigure my SPREADSHEETzorx!
... [time passes] ...
OKAY! NEW SPREADSHEETzorx! This spreadsheet allows you to configure how much initial funding goes to $QI SUPPLY and QI-AVAX LP STAKE as well as configuring amount of $AVAX yield that goes back into the QI-AVAX LP.
WAT DO?
What we need to do is to go back to the drawing board and RETHINK the QI-AVAX relationship (as more than just LP-utility). Which we will do. In a new pop-quiz. After this (sub) (???) pop-quiz?
Yes.
SUB POP-QUIZ!
What initial configuration maximizes total yields?
