Let's do the ETHBTC-THANG! FÜR REALz, this time, folks!
I record the $ADA price from @Indigo_protocol and the $ETH and $BTC prices from @Levana_protocol.
EMA20 indicators saying { $ETH, $BTC } -> $ADA swap is good, if that's your THANG!
It's not for me, so I chill.
Why is the { $ETH, $BTC } -> $ADA swap NOT my THANG?
My financial goals.
My goal with @Indigo_protocol is to accumulate as much $ETH and $BTC (actually, $iETH and $iBTC) as possible AND HODL!
Swapping from those synthetics, EVEN for later gains of same, is counter to my goals.
2024-01-04 ETHBTC-THANG! Day 221
The ETHBTC-THANG!
- swap 0.00230 $BTC
After swap:
ETH: 4.81699 BTC: 0.0000
Total: $10,899.50 TVL EMA-20: $11,114.55
n.b.: TVL EMA-20 indicates that ETHBTC, itself, is undervalued.
ROI: -2.87% APR: -4.75%
Is this 'cheating' the system?
Some of you may say that, but I disagree. Why? Because the call was to
- swap from 0.0023 $BTC
and I had 0.002486 '$BTC' in $KUJI;
and,
- swap to 0.04466 $ETH
And I'm swapping to 0.049222 $ETH because of arbitration.
Takeaway
So, what's the takeaway here? That I'm smart?
Well, yeah.
But the better takeaway is the one that empowers YOU.
The call was to swap 0.0023 $BTC to $ETH. I didn't have that $BTC, ACTUALLY, but I could get to that VIRTUALLY, so I used what I could to improve upon the trade.
That's the real takeaway. You see a trade, take it. If you don't have the thunk to MAKE the trade (maker), create a world where you do, be it, in this case: treat $KUJI as virtual $BTC, but in other cases it could be 'borrow $BTC' or 'leverage a position' or 'lease' or whatever.
The point is this:
Don't say: "I can't."
"I don't have $1M, so I can't do el geophf's trades."
I don't have $1M, either, but I have $1K, that I can trade 1,000 times, which is $1M in total volume.
See? You don't have to have a whale's bag to BE a whale.
Be the whale, fam. ❤️
No comments:
Post a Comment