Wednesday, August 3, 2022

Answers 4 to supplying QI pop-quiz

Answer 4a to the supplying $QI pop-quiz. I (kinda?) answered this in the metadata (μεταδατα, a solidly Greek word) to Answer 3:


$QI gained: $7,306.55
$AVAX gained: $492.02

So, that's $6,814.53 more $QI than $AVAX.

SPREADSHEETSzorx!

Answer 4b

This question is a touch ambiguous. I interpreted it to mean year-end $AVAX- and $QI-yields. 

Given that, a new tab, "Balance QI and QI-AVAX seed," on the SPREADSHEETzorx! shows that 98% goes to initial $QI SUPPLY and 2% goes to QI-AVAX LP STAKE.

Can we do better than this approach? YES, WE ... sorry, I meant to write: "well, let's see!" in the next set of answers and following exercises.

Answer 4c

66% $AVAX-yield and 33% $QI-yield. As you can see from the previous answer, even a 98% $QI seed only gives a 50% $AVAX yield, SO! to answer this question, we need to continuously resupply the QI-AVAX LP STAKE to generate more $QI to generate more $AVAX yield.

This will require I reconfigure my SPREADSHEETzorx!

... [time passes] ...

OKAY! NEW SPREADSHEETzorx! This spreadsheet allows you to configure how much initial funding goes to $QI SUPPLY and QI-AVAX LP STAKE as well as configuring amount of $AVAX yield that goes back into the QI-AVAX LP.



BUT IT SHOWS that $QI yield is always higher.

WAT DO?

What we need to do is to go back to the drawing board and RETHINK the QI-AVAX relationship (as more than just LP-utility). Which we will do. In a new pop-quiz. After this (sub) (???) pop-quiz?

Yes.

SUB POP-QUIZ!

What initial configuration maximizes total yields?

No comments:

Post a Comment