Self-funding experiments, part trois

Reflect

Next up in our self-funding survey, we visit @Reflectaverse. 

Nice collection of yields; 😊

not so nice price-direction for the token yielded. 😭

So, for this bad boy (@Reflectaverse), I'll reinvest the yields 50% / 50%:

• 50% into ECHO-ONE LP to produce more $ECHO
• 50% into top yielding rf-token(s?)

Which means we have to find the top-yielding rf-tokens, but first: ECHO-ONE LP.

Okay, so, which rf-tokens are HAWT to invest in?

Just imagine me, and you'll see the HAWT rf-tokens. 😎

Or you could use SPREADSHEETs, too.

Let's do the latter. The spreadsheet says $rfETH and $rfDAI are equally HAWT!

Let's invest in those 2 rf-tokens with our remaining $ECHO.

And so we swap half our $ECHO for $rfETH and $rfDAI, setting the slippage to 15%, so we can lose an f-ton of value in these trades, smh. 

After the above trades, our @Reflectaverse portfolio looks like the following. 

I think there's a healthy balance between the $ECHO-producing LP and the rf-tokens that (will eventually) (someday) produce harvestable yields. 

Is @Reflectaverse a viable place to put additional funds?

Not only 'no,' but HELLz nah!

Yields are coming in at a good clip, but the $ECHO token, and all rf-tokens are down ~50% since I invested.

The yields earned from these stakes in no way make up for these losses.

HARD PASS.