What to do when an arb goes South?
ATOM
So, ./vern, my main man, ./vern recommended I trade
axlUSDC -> SCRT -> USK
on my $ATOM-arb.
However.
SCRT/USK is a dead pool.
Wat do?
Step 1: panic at the disco as I fandango on core.
Step 2.a. Keep panicking
2.b. panic, more, as I struggle with the existential question: "2.b.? or not 2.b.?"
2.c. Cancel my order on the ded SCRT/USK pool
2.d. placed 351 SCRT -> _ axlUSDC, SELL at 0.708
Why? SCRT/axlUSDC has 1.5k volume. I move my liquidity to axlUSDC there.
When SCRT/axlUSDC sell order is fulfilled, I'll continue the $ATOM-arb from there. I was fortunate this time: $SCRT's price is rising, so I walk away from this mistake without needing to abandon the arb at a loss.
I have had to abandon soured arbs before.
DOT
Meanwhile, on my $DOT-arb, $ETH has rocketed up by $100, making my buy-order look ridiculous.
Same procedure, but different, because:
1. we do cancel the order, ...
Now, I'm not going to SAY that ./vern's recommendations are problematic, but ...
./vern's recommendations are problematic.
Why?
1. the $STARS pools don't have a lot of liquidity, so I'll get stuck again, just as when I did with $SCRT.
and 2. the nextest bestest recommendation brings $DOT in at around ~25, which is what we started with.
So, is it easier to swap right back to $DOT, and more profitable?
- placed 113 USK -> _ DOT, BUY at 4.399 fulfilled
So, when arb'ing 'x' across multiple order books, you always have to ask yourself, ALWAYS, ALWAYS, ALWAYS!
"Can I swap back to x at a profit?"
If the answer is 'yes,' I say, take the earnings and walk away as a winner, UNLESS, there's a longer path that's SUBSTANTIALLY better.
So, some of the best arbs are: x -> y -> x, like:
KUJI -> ATOM -> KUJI or
wETH -> USK -> wETH or
axlUSDC -> USK or ... whatever
A simple swap, then swap back, and you have more of 'x'?
Do I have to say this again, louder?
YOU HAVE MORE 'X'!
That's an arb. That's a win.
No comments:
Post a Comment