2022-12-19: DOT arbitrage

Let's do the same thing for a $DOT arbitration. 

./vern recommends: DOT,axlUSDC,SCRT,USK,DOT

So we place the order:

• placed 25.24845 $DOT -> 115.7389 $axlUSDC, SELL at 4.584 fulfilled

The $DOT sell order hit.

Of course it did, it being an up-market, and all.

So, lettuce consultus ./vern, my main man, ./vern.

./vern is all over the map: recommending ATOM/OSMO (nope), and saying SCRT will give `inf` returns (nope).

Two words, folks: NOPE! 😤

So, ./vern is steady.

./vern is dependable.

./vern, my main man, is my main man, ... ICYMI.

But, when ./vern goes off the rails like this, that's why I have ./emily, whom I always turn to for Good Counsel.

But, after all the code changes, ./emily be illn' rn.

Let's fix ./emily

./emily: fixed https://github.com/logicalgraphs/crypto-n-rust/blob/main/src/ch08/intimate/intimate.rs

...I also removed those nagging `inf`-paths, to boot.

./emily says the straight swap-back or the axlUSDC-USK paths get me 25 $DOT back.

So, ./vern's $wETH-détour is best, then. Let's do that.

• DOT,axlUSDC,USK,wETH,axlUSDC,DOT
• placed 115 axlUSDC -> 113.3552 USK, SELL at 0.9772 fulfilled
• placed 113 USK -> _ wETH, BUY at 1,128.99 cancelled
• DOT,axlUSDC,USK,DOT
• placed 113 USK -> 25.6877 DOT, BUY at 4.399 fulfilled

2022-12-19, 25.24845 DOT -> 2022-12-22 25.6877 DOT 1.74% ROI, 3 days. Trade closed.